E-portfolios, good or bad thing?
Could they not become unduly burdensome? I have this image of us turning into snails with this vast aggregations of information on our backs (even if it is digital).
Are they for everyone?
New Scientist this week (16 OCT 2010, vol 208. No. 2782) puts ‘Life Logging’ into its ’50 Ideas that will change science forever’list.
It all started with Vannevar Bursh in 1945 with something he called ‘an enlarged intimate supplement to his memory.’ Fifty years on Bill Gates is quoted as saying ‘someday computer will store everything a person has ever seen and heard.’ Somewhat over ambitiously (especially as it went nowhere), in 2000 I registered domain names ‘The Contents of My Brain’ and ‘TMCB’ thinking that there could be a place for an electronic diary, scrap-book, journal, album thingey.
I lacked the wherewithal or ambition to develop this further, in any case, I recall meeting the folk from Digitalbrain who seemed to be doing a good job of it.
Does there need to be a market leader?
Using a variety of platforms are not e-portfolios being achieved?
Some people look forwards, some look back.
Which kind person succeeds? A sparsely filled e-portfolio might be a good sign – they are getting on with doing.
And whilst I’m a fervent Futurist, is there not a place for real portfolios (artwork), albums (photos, including those framed and on the wall in a real gallery), books on shelves and files in trunks.
I recently found my H801 file, March 2001. Course work printed out, the few articles sourced online printed off, even a painfully thin listserve thread forum message thingey. And an assignment on DCode a CD-rom for schools that won national and international awards including a Palm D’or for Multimedia at Cannes in 1998).
Had I put this online would I have referred to it over the last decade? Instead serendipity leads me to finding in in a box in the garage. Does an eportfolio facilitate serendipity, or is the process of loading it with ‘stuff’ going to be too prescriptive so that ultimately it narrows minds, rather than opens them up?
Old news keeps like fish.
Where does this expression come from?
Does it apply to course work too?
Even if I had an e-portfolio of what value would my old History, Geography and English A’ levels essays be? Do they have more value digitized and online than in a file in a box in garage by the sea?
The brain does something e-portfolios are yet able to do well, which is to forget stuff, to abandon content yet be prepared to re-link if required to do so.
Time to quiz the neuroscientist me thinks.